Tag: Rochester

I went to the Cineworld cinema to see the latest instalment of the 28 Days Later franchise. A wasn’t really that interested in seeing this a few months ago. There’s only so much horror films bother me and I find them mostly stupid. But, over the xmas break I watched all the previous 28 Days films. I think they were on offer on iTunes or whatever Apple call their video store and I bought them remembering that 28 Days Later was a great film from the distant past. There were a few things I could remember about 28 Days Later that stuck with me – wandering around an empty London, dodgy army people and the final cottage and aircraft flying by. So, over xmas I watched the first three films. 28 Days Later is still amazing and for me was more a story about human survival and the human condition than being a pure zombie flick. The second film wasn’t great, standard zombie stuff. But 28 Years Later was amazing. An excellent film about humans and how they might react and cope post apocalypse.

So to the most recent film. The tide was very low as I drove the river road to the cinema. But I will say it seemed even lower a few hours later so I’m not really sure what’s going on with that. It was dark both times so maybe the reflections – how I judge the river level – were playing tricks on me. I really enjoyed this film and rated it 8/10 on IMBd afterwards. You should read this communication from the before-times to see how the rating system works.

The zombies were playing a secondary role in this film, much like the previous one. This was really a story about human survival and how things could go after a catastrophic event. What happens to an eight year old when everything they know is torn apart? What happens to a doctor when they lose the world? I really enjoyed this film. It’s really well made. It looks great. I will say there are some scenes of torture that seemed a little much but then nothing was explicit and the actual violence was mostly implied. Two people walked out of the cinema shortly after the barn scene. I think the inclusion of the scene is justified as it shows what the Jimmys are capable of.

The absolute best scene was with Dr Kelson pretending to be the devil and putting on a show for some visitors. The music first of all was perfect. I’ve been a huge Iron Maiden fan and to play Number Of The Beast loud and unapologetically while Dr Kelson sings and throws fire around was absolute film making at its best. I loved that scene. Stunning.

Spoiler Warning.

The final scene opening with a cottage and subtle views of a Landrover excited me. Probably because the first film was in my recent memory. It was great. I sat up straight and enjoyed it immensely.

This film is highly recommended for the humanity displayed, the cinematography and the overall story. Just excuse the torture porn.

I decided to have a cheeky midweek visit to the movie house. Of course I went to the Cineworld cinema at Rochester. It’s probably not the closest cinema to me but it’s the one I’ve been going to since the late 90s and the parking is free, the river is pretty and it’s not in Maidstone. While driving next to the river I noticed there were many birds sitting on the mudflats. So, I think this happens when the tide is about halfway. I’m not sure why this would be their behaviour, I’ll have to look into it. I would also like to point out that I haven’t seen this is daylight, I’ve only noticed it recently and in the dark so it could be something else entirely. I will post photos next time there’s so sunlight showing the scene rather than reflected street lighting from the East Kent side of the county

I like writing these communications after seeing a film as it gives me an extra way to interact with the film. I can react to something and wonder how I will explain that in my way in my words. I sometimes think that there’s a particular scene or phrase I need to remember as it was really something I wanted to write about. I expect I forget most of these as I don’t make notes in the theatre. I rated this film on IMDb and before you complain about the score you need to know there is a system and it is explained in this communication from 2014. I rated this film 4/10.

This was not a good film. I rewatched the first film before christmas and thought it was kinda ok. The story seems quite routine but it was visually stunning. I’m not sure what I would have rated it after seeing it at the cinema. Then I also watched the second film while wrapping presents and generally chilling out on christmas eve. I really didn’t like it. I stayed watching it because I had paid for it and I sort of wanted to see what happens at the end. That is the reason I went to see this current film. I could spend some time in a warm building where someone else is paying for the heat – the UK is currently in a cold snap – and it would finish the story off. I was NOT wanting to sit through over three hours of film.

The visuals had been done before and so I don’t think anything need be said about those. I’m going to concentrate on the storyline. It was shit. Derivative. Boring. Entirely ordinary. Borderline terrible. I hated it. The whole world knew how the story was going to finish by then end of the second movie. There might be a few minor details you wouldn’t have predicted but overall it ends how you expect it to end. The natives win the big battle. Everyone cheers. There isn’t a sense of loss over those who died in the battle. No discussion about the future. No plans to stop the sky-people. Utter shit.

This film also explains so much about the current state of capitalism on planet Earth. When leaving the cinema people should be thinking about how companies are tearing up the planet for the sake of money for the few. Because more money means more power and more power means more money. These ideas are a cancer to the long term efforts of humans and Earth as a whole. Just because this Avatar story is set on a planet a few trillion miles away [which was mentioned in the script but it’s probably not a correct number but there’s a definite CBA about fact-checking it] it clearly is meant to show the exploitation of other countries for the enrichment of our own. If you leave this film feeling slightly sorry for the natives and the creatures of that world then perhaps you should think about who the fuck you vote for at the next general election.

A few aspects of this film that made me super annoyed should be noted. The first thing, and that isn’t just this film but part 2 also was Jake Sully making his kids call him “Sir”. I am going to maintain that if you make your kids call you “Sir” then you are an arsehole. I understand that he is training them for war and he wants them to understand how to fight but be a human-fucking-being about it. They are your children. You are their dad. Let them call you dad. Oh, by the way, that’s not the only absolutely toxic masculine trait that Sully manifests. So much of this movie glorifies fighting and battle it’s an absolute testosterone fest. Absolute bullshit. Proper American grade wank fest of jingoism.

I was annoyed at the potential sacrifice scene that occurs about two thirds of the way through the movie. It was a logical move but man, they didn’t need to play it so Abrahamic. Let’s head out into the woods to slaughter a child for the sake of the future of the blues. If this film had any guts it would have killed that kid and dealt with the consequences of that. But it chickened out. The film didn’t want to face tough decisions. It wanted to glorify fighting for what you believe in against a much larger force, against the USA. Maybe this film was an analogy of the white invaders to the Americas causing death and destruction. I mean, it’s not that subtle really if it is that. I wonder if general white USA will notice?

While the blues fought off the sky-people do they really think that they are safe given the value of the natural resources on their moon-world? Of course you aren’t. Humans have such need for greed in the current system. We are burning our own planet because we can. We will burn it all down just so a couple of people can be extremely wealthy. Until the mega rich are prosecuted and sent to prison there will be no peace and no fixing of the problems of this world.

This film was not really disappointing. I wasn’t expecting much. It lived up to my expectations. I didn’t leave the film feeling despondent. There have been plenty of other films I’ve really wanted to be good but were utter shit. They left me feeling rubbish for ages. The Phantom Menace broke me. Alien – Prometheus did the same. Such excellent promise ruined by bad film making. I’ll leave you with one good thing about this film – The first time I looked at my watch was two hours into the over three hour movie. I didn’t get uncomfortable in my seat which happens when I am really bored. So maybe this film held my attention for most of its runtime.

I went to see the film Anaconda on Boxing Day. It was dark when I got to the cinema but I think the tide was fully in, there were wavy reflections right up to the wharf edge. I rated this film on IMDb and there’s a communication here explaining the rules of those ratings. I used to share my ratings to Twitter but that no longer exists – it transformed into a place of hate. So now I screenshot my ratings.

This film was kinda fun. The first half was slow and boring and full of Jack Black being Jack Black. The second half was more fun and had some genuinely funny parts. Jack Black was still playing Jack Black though. The film was too “meta” for its own good I reckon. But I enjoyed it.

I snuck out last night to watch the film Eternity at the cinema in Rochester. It was dark when I arrived and also raining a little so I don’t really know what was going on with the levels of the river Medway. I tried looking but there were reflections everywhere and it was not easy to tell where the edge of the water was. Other people from where I work were doing important customer relations so it felt a little cheeky to be heading out for the evening.

I rated this film on IMDb and for an explanation of how the system works you should read this communication. I rated this film 6/10.

I didn’t know what to expect with this film. All I knew was that it was about someone who had to choose between two men in the afterlife. I hadn’t realised this was a comedy and so when the first few laughs happened I was somewhat surprised but I leant into that and eventually there were times when I was the only person who found a particular instance laugh out loud. I don’t know why this happens I just think I sometimes find strange things funny. Overall I enjoyed this film, it was good fun.

Eternity had the overall feel of a film from a past era. It was kind, funny and just nice to watch. Also, and I think this is important, it wasn’t too long. There are way too many films out there going past the two hour mark. If you want to make a film that long it’s fine but you are playing with reaching the bum-seat-fidget limits.

I don’t know if Eternity would be a good idea. Who would want to spend forever in one place doing one thing. The great thing about life is that it changes, we learn from new experiences and we grow. Being stuck in a single place forever, that seems like hell to me. Bring on the void. Fortunately we know that stuff isn’t true and we can just die and be gone.

Sorry, back to the film. It was fun, well made and also good looking. There are the usual twists and turns in the plot as you would expect with someone having to choose between two people. The acting was good and I’m sure there were lots of little funny touches I missed in the background. The film was rated 15 by the BBFC with a written caution for “strong sex”. I don’t think I watch the same film they rated. There were two sex scenes, but the focus was definitely not on anything more than you would expect in something broadcast on TV during the day. I don’t know how they reached this rating.

Well, what to say about this film? We can start with the formalities. I went to the cinema at Rochester, the tide was very low. I could see all the mud banks at the edge of the river along with the dip at the end showing the main channel. We were late getting to the cinema because the junction on the motorway was closed so we had to go to the next junction and then return back. I didn’t mind being late because we missed most of the adverts. We did see a few trailers though. The trailer for F1 managed to make the film look as boring as fuck. So, back to Mission: Impossible. I rated this film on IMDB and there is a guide to my rating system here.

I really didn’t enjoy this film. Had I not been with other people I would probably have walked out after the first half hour and overall the film is 2 hours and 50 minutes. I turned to JCBFan after about half an hour and asked “do you understand any of this?”. The reply was “no”. Maybe there were loads of references to MI films I haven’t seen? Maybe I needed to learn a bit more about the characters but the first half hour was really disjointed and made zero sense. I think it was meant to be a “getting the team together” thing, but it was really badly done.

The rest of the over two hours of film was really just two large set pieces of action. Some submarine stuff which was done better in Hunt For Red October and The Abyss and also some flying stuff which was alright I guess. At least I now know how to punch someone piloting a biplane when I’m holding on to the side – the move was used twice and it annoyed me – although why change something that works. The set design for the submarine was pretty special and the way it rotated was impressive. But the story part of this was shit.

The general plot seemed to be that the internet is bad and it is going to kill the human race. This I agree with and if it was deliberate to warn of the perils of social media and untruths then that would be a good part of the film. There’s an AI going to destroy the world and is slowly taking control of nuclear weapons – which hilariously is shown on a giant map on the wall inside a mountain. WHILE at the same time people push little models of ships around on giant maps in the room which was very WWII. So much of this film was just stupid. I didn’t understand what they were trying to do and why.

The American Navy was scared of the Russian carrier but it’s a heap of shit so that wouldn’t really bother them. The USA also have a LOAD of carriers. I don’t think the naval tensions were really worth it. Did you know you can fly a DC3 from the Bering Straight to South Africa in less than twelve hours? Those DC3s are notorious for transcontinental journeys in no time. Oh, and they are super comfortable. Also, people seem to have normal volume conversations in loads of situations where the actual noise would be consuming. If you’ve ever seen pilots in little planes they wear headsets. There’s always noise.

We need to know a bit about the data transfer rates that work in this film. The “entity” – what a fucking shit name – could “move” very quickly. Even when a thingy was connected to a boggler in the middle of South Africa away from any form of internet connection. Did you know that pick pockets are really good at grabbing something and taking it within a 100 millisecond window? Human reactions are hardwired at best to 190 milliseconds so she wouldn’t have been able to take the dongle out in time. Why was there a woman who speaks only French which most people understand but she also understands all the English being spoken? Who was fighting who in the cave? Who turned up to start that fight? Why do people who live on an island in the arctic know the yield of atomic weapons and detailed specifications about how long you have to run after cutting the wires? God this film was absolute shit.

Angela Bassett was pretty good in it.